USPTO serial 78107457
NEURONTIN ST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEURONTIN ST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jane Ungaro, Cynthia Arellano, Christopher Bolinger, Romy Corliss, Richard A. Friedman, Stacey Hallerman, Judy McCool, Heather A. McDonald, Sudipta Rao, Arthur A. Silverstein, Tiffany Trunko, Jennet S. Walker, Cindy M. Zelson, Warren L. Zeserman
JANE UNGARO WING BPFIZER INC LEGAL DIVISION201 TABOR RDMORRIS PLAINS, NJ 07950Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations, namely, treatments for pain and for disorders of the central nervous system | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |