USPTO serial 78107577
STRIPE WRITER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STRIPE WRITER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MALIBU, CA
MALIBU, CA
MALIBU, CA
REIGATE, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Pens, namely coloring pens, writing pens, drawing pens and felt tip markers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JAKKS PACIFIC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JPI COLORWORKSHOP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JPI COLORWORKSHOP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by P&M PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named STRIPE WRITER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |