USPTO serial 78107652
FLYING DAYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLYING DAYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EQUIPMENT FOR INFORMATION PROCESSING, NAMELY, COMPUTERS MONITORS, KEYBOARDS, MOUSE, CALCULATORS, ANTENNAS; COMPUTER SERVERS, WIRELESS DATA NETWORK, NAMELY, SATELLITES; MULTI- PLATFORM INTERFACES, NAMELY, COMPUTER INTERFACE BOARDS AND CALCULATORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES, ENTERTAINMENT APPLICATIONS ON COMPUTERS, ELECTRONIC TRANSMITTED DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY, MOBILE RADIO COMMUNICATION; WIRELESS NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY, WIRELESS DIGITAL MESSAGING SERVICES; COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, TRANSMITTED STEAMED SOUND AND AUDIO-VISUAL RECORDING VIA INTERNET PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER DIAL-UP AND DEDICATED ACCESS TO THE INTERNET; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES, CABLE TELEVISION TRANSMISSION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |