USPTO serial 78107690
CRX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. DeCAMP
JAMES D DECAMP CLARK & ELBING, LLP101 FEDERAL STBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Prescription pharmaceuticals, namely therapeutic agents and/or combination therapeutic agents for the treatment of a neoplasm, a metabolic disorder, or an infection | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |