USPTO serial 78107698
CRX PHARMACEUTICALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRX PHARMACEUTICALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. DeCamp
JAMES D DECAMP CLARK & ELBING, LLP101 FEDERAL STBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Prescription pharmaceuticals, namely therapeutic agents and/or combination therapeutic agents for the treatment of a neoplasm, an immunoinflammatory disease, a metabolic disorder, or an infection | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |