USPTO serial 78107773
DIGILENS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGILENS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grace J. Han
GRACE J HAN PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION SERVICES; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF PHOTONIC COMPONENTS, NAMELY, FEASIBILITY STUDIES, DESIGN REQUIREMENT CAPTURE, PRODUCT SPECIFICATION, AND IMPLEMENTATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FILED OF SOFTWARE, NAMELY DESIGNING MATHEMATICAL MODELS AND OTHER DESIGN TOOLS, NAMELY, SOFTWARE TOOLS FOR PHOTONIC COMPONENTS SPECIFICATION AND DESIGN; SYSTEM DESIGN, NAMELY, PHOTONIC COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT BY WAY OF FEASIBILITY STUDIES, PHOTONIC COMPONENT SPECIFICATION, DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LICENSING; AND TECHNICAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF PHOTONIC COMPONENT SPECIFICATION, DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS CAPTURE, SPECIFICATION, DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |