USPTO serial 78107803
DEEPWEB.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEEPWEB.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore Oshman
THEODORE OSHMAN OSHMAN, HELFENSTEIN, MIRISOLA & SCHWARTZ116 JOHN STNEW YORK, NY 10038UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services in the fields of information technology, internet and intranet technology, designing and implementing web sites and web pages, integration of computer systems and networks, computer systems analysis, database development services, internet based sales, internet advertising, general consumer and commercial merchandising all incorporating promotional concepts, namely, providing referrals to web sites, persons or entities with an online presence by means of listing in search results, on-line auctions, incentives based on consumer purchasing behavior, advertiser bidding to promote placement, advertiser payment for performance, advertiser payment per click, advertiser payment for the use of affiliate advertising, promotional displays and web site links on the web pages of others; providing marketing information services and market research services to promote the usage and sale of products and information on the internet. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |