USPTO serial 78107924
AT&T DIGITAL ALL IN ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AT&T DIGITAL ALL IN ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID J CHO
ONE AT&T WAYBEDMINSTER, NJ 07921UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, LOCAL, LONG DISTANCE, AND INTERNATIONAL VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; FRAME RELAY TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; VIRTUAL NETWORK TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; ELECTRONIC DATA TRANSMISSION PACKET SERVICES; COMPUTER AIDED TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND IMAGES; AUDIO AND VIDEO TELECONFERENCING SERVICES; PRIVATE LINE VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL NETWORK (ISDN) TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA VIA TERRESTRIAL AND UNDERSEA TELECOMMUNICATIONS LINKS; 800 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; 900 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; SWITCHED TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, NAMELY THE SIMULTANEOUS, BI-DIRECTIONAL INTERACTIVE TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, VIDEO AND MULTIMEDIA SERVICES; ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER MODE (ATM) SERVICES; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO WORLDWIDE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, OTHER COMPUTER NETWORKS, ON-LINE SERVICES AND BULLETIN BOARDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |