Drawing for EXPRESSCENT

USPTO serial 78108044

EXPRESSCENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCRAY, RENEE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPRESSCENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan M. Shook

SUSAN M SHOOK THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANYONE PROCTER & GAMBLE PLZCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemical preparations for use in manufacturing in the nature of a perfume technology comprised of a carrier and a polymer that can be incorporated into various shapes and product forms, including powdered beads, compacted powder forms in the nature of tablets and sheets, anhydrous gel suspensions, aerosol sprays, candles and potpourri, and is triggered by the natural components in the air, providing for long-term release of perfumeACTIVE—
003potpourriACTIVE—
004CandlesACTIVE—
005Room deodorizers, air freshenersACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely shirts, pants, dresses, headgear in the nature of hats and scarves, jackets and coatsACTIVE—
040Treatment of materials, namely, the chemical treatment of ingredients contained in candles, potpourri, room deodorizers, air fresheners and of clothing fibers with a timed-release perfume technology based on the triggered release of perfume, where the trigger is a natural component of airACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 8, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 16, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance