USPTO serial 78108067
SEABRIDGE CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2929563Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 1, 2005
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SEABRIDGE CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oly Mandalay Bay General Partnership
Oxnard, CA
Other trademarks owned by Oly Mandalay Bay General Partnership
Oly Mandalay Bay General Partnership
Oxnard, CA
Other trademarks owned by Oly Mandalay Bay General Partnership
D. R. HORTON LOS ANGELES HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
ARLINGTON, TX
Other trademarks owned by D. R. HORTON LOS ANGELES HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
D. R. HORTON LOS ANGELES HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
ARLINGTON, TX
Other trademarks owned by D. R. HORTON LOS ANGELES HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANFORD E WARREN, JR
SANFORD E WARREN JR AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP1700 PACIFIC AVE STE 4100DALLAS, TX 75201-4675UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate brokerage of land parcels; real estate brokerage in the nature of residential and commercial real estate | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 19, 2002 |
| 037 | Land development services, namely, the planning, development and laying out of residential and commercial communities; real estate development services, including the planning, development, laying out and construction of residential and commercial communities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 19, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oly Mandalay Bay General Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by Oly Mandalay Bay General Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by D. R. HORTON LOS ANGELES HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by D. R. HORTON LOS ANGELES HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named SEABRIDGE CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |