USPTO serial 78108175
C TECH 21
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2915955Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 4, 2005
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with C TECH 21?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD E JENKINS
RICHARD E JENKINS JENKINS WILSON & TAYLOR PA3100 TOWER BLVD STE 1200UNIVERSITY TWRDURHAM, NC 27707Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the convenience store industry, namely, Point of Sale, Back office electronic Solutions, Inventory Control, Management data and transfers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 26, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 27, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |