USPTO serial 78108319
NOXENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOXENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Corporation 3-SOFT Inc./3-SOFT Corporation, Inc.
Brossard, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Corporation 3-SOFT Inc./3-SOFT Corporation, Inc.
Corporation 3-SOFT Inc./3-SOFT Corporation, Inc.
Brossard, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Corporation 3-SOFT Inc./3-SOFT Corporation, Inc.
BROSSARD, QUEBEC PROVINCE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Weinstein
DAVID A WEINSTEIN DAVID A WEINSTEIN1600 BROADWAY STE 2600DENVER, CO 80202-4989UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing remote management services namely managing and operating computer communications servers, business productivity management software, operating systems, hardware and devices namely, telecommunication devices namely-- hubs, switches, routers, printers, and other micro-computer related devices, namely-- palmtop computers, handheld computers, laptops; monitoring the management and support of computer systems and infrastructures for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Corporation 3-SOFT Inc./3-SOFT Corporation, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Corporation 3-SOFT Inc./3-SOFT Corporation, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 9158-7147 QUEBEC INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NOXENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |