USPTO serial 78108483
PACIFIC NANOTECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 2004
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PACIFIC NANOTECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Cady
HAROLD J MILSTEIN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP275 MIDDLEFIELD RDMENLO PARK, CA 94025-3506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MICROSCOPES, ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPES, ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY SYSTEMS, NAMELY, ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPES, COMPUTER HARDWARE, ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR MICROSCOPES, ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPE SCANNERS, MICROSCOPE STAGES, MICROSCOPE SENSORS AND PROBES, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ACQUIRING, DISPLAYING AND ANALYZING IMAGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ACQUIRING, DISPLAYING AND ANALYZING IMAGES, FOR IMPORTING, PROCESSING, EVALUATING AND PRESENTING TOPOGRAPHICAL DATA, ALL FOR MICROSCOPIC IMAGES; ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR MICROSCOPES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2002 |
| 040 | Manufacturing of microscopy equipment to the order and specification of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Nanotechnology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Nanotechnology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Nanotechnology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named PACIFIC NANOTECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |