USPTO serial 78108635
LONDON GLITZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LONDON GLITZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sophie B. Anger
SOPHIE B ANGER OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLP666 THIRD AVE STE 1900NEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery, cosmetics and toiletries, namely, perfume, eau de parfum, eau de toilette, cologne, bath oil, body lotion, shower gel, cleansing shower cream, after-shower/bath body cream, dusting powder, body cleansing lotion, body cleansing cream, facial cleansing lotion, facial cleansing cream, facial cleansing gel, foaming cleansing body lotion, foaming cleansing body cream, skin moisturizing lotion, skin moisturizing cream, skin moisturizing balm, skin moisturizing gel, facial moisturizing lotion, facial moisturizing cream, facial moisturizing gel, body balm, body cleansing scrub, moisturizing foot balm, body spray, body mist, liquid bath soak, powdered bath soak, body exfoliating cleanser, hand cream, foot cream, massage oil, self-tanning bronzing lotion, self-tanning bronzing cream, exfoliating facial masque, cleansing facial masque, moisturizing facial masque, liquid body wash, cleansing bar, fragranced soap, bath salts, hair shampoo, hair conditioner and makeup | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | scented candles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |