USPTO serial 78108809
ARROW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARROW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cambridge, Ontario, CA
Cambridge, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric Marich
ERIC MARICH THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY20 S VAN BUREN AVEBARBERTON, OH 44203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER-OPERATED MACHINES, AND PARTS THEREOF, WHICH USE PRESSURIZED WATER TO REMOVE SLUDGE DEPOSITS FROM NUCLEAR STEAM GENERATORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | REPAIR OF POWER-OPERATED MACHINES WHICH USE PRESSURIZED WATER TO REMOVE SLUDGE DEPOSITS FROM NUCLEAR STEAM GENERATORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN AND ENGINEERING, FOR OTHERS, OF POWER-OPERATED MACHINES WHICH USE PRESSURIZED WATER TO REMOVE SLUGE DEPOSITS FROM NUCLEAR STEAM GENERATORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Babcock & Wilcox Canada Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Babcock & Wilcox Canada Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ARROW
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |