Drawing for THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUILT BY MCI

USPTO serial 78109021

THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUILT BY MCI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUILT BY MCI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANIS M. MANNING

JANIS M MANNING VERIZON CORPORATE SERVICES GROUP INC1515 N CT HOUSE RD STE 500ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications services, namely, the electronic transmission of voice, data and informationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 22, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 17, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 3, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 30, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 30, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Dec 29, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 25, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Feb 24, 2003IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Dec 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance