USPTO serial 78109031
GOOD NIGHT'S SLEEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2896461Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 2004
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GOOD NIGHT'S SLEEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BOCA RATON, FL
BOCA RATON, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KOURTNEY MULCAHY
ROGER S THOMPSON COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANESTE 1210551 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF SLEEP DISORDERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |