USPTO serial 78109145
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Acquisition and distribution of television programming, radio programing, motion pictures, films, laser discs, video and audio tapes, music videos, audiovisual programming, and audio programming for others; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site containing information on the distribution and acquisition of motion pictures, films, laser discs, video and audio tapes, music videos, audiovisual programming, and audio programming; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring news, reviews and information related to the entertainment and film industries; entertainment services, namely, providing information about and critical reviews of motion pictures, films, videos, music videos, audio visual programming and audio programming; archives and libraries containing motion pictures, films, videos, music videos, audio visual programming and audio programming; on-line library services, namely, providing electronic library services that feature motion pictures, films, videos, music videos, audiovisual programming, and audio programming | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |