USPTO serial 78109150
SUPERTICKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERTICKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kirkland, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SALLY M ABEL
SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VLY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-2008Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Computer and telecommunications services, namely electronic, analog and digital transmission of data, voice, images, signals, messages, audio, video, audio-video and interactive audio-video programming and content via the Internet, cable and/ or satellite networks, and/ or private networks; telecommunications services, namely, providing multiple user access to digital, web and interactive television services and Internet-based, cable and / or satellite network-based and/ or private network-based interactive content and databases; Internet broadcasting services; digital television broadcasting services; interactive television broadcasting services; cable television broadcasting services; satellite television broadcasting services; providing multiple-user access to the Internet, wide-area and local-area computer information networks, cable and! or satellite radio networks, and! or private networks; cable radio broadcasting services; satellite radio broadcasting services; delivery of messages by electronic transmission; pay-per-view television transmission services; video-on-demand transmission services; content delivery services, namely, electronic transmission of interactive media via the Internet, cable networks, satellite networks, or private networks; providing electronic mail services; providing multiple user access to a global computer information network which allows access to interactive content and media, namely, video, audio, television and radio programming, music and movies, and a wide-range of information, over broadband, satellite, cable, digital subscriber lines, and digital landlines to end users' consumer electronic, mobile electronic, personal and handheld computers, set-top boxes, televisions and other consumer hardware devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |