Drawing for DUCAL

USPTO serial 78109171

DUCAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUCAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Augusto Perera, Esq.

Augusto Perera, Esq. Augusto Perera, P.A.121 Alhambra PlazaSuite 1500Coral Gables, FL 33134

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, wines, brandy, sherry, and liqueursACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2023ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Apr 21, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 29, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 25, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 16, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 30, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 10, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 15, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 21, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance