USPTO serial 78109209
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne E. Graybeal
LYNNE E GRAYBEAL PERKINS COIE LLPPERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Stuffed TOY animals; dolls; toy banks; TOY ARROWS; BABY MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS; BATH TOYS; BATTERY OPERATED ACTION TOYS; BENDABLE TOYS; CHILDREN'S ACTIVITY TABLES CONTAINING MANIPULABLE TOYS WHICH CONVERT TO EASELS; TOY CHILDREN'S BACKPACKS; CHILDREN'S MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS; CHILDREN'S WIRE CONSTRUCTION AND ART ACTIVITY TOYS; CONSTRUCTION TOYS; CRIB TOYS; DISC TOSS TOYS; DRAWING TOYS; ELECTRIC ACTION TOYS; FANTASY CHARACTER TOYS; TOY FLYING SAUCERS; INFANT ACTION CRIB TOYS; INFANT TOYS; INFLATABLE TOYS; MECHANICAL TOYS; MUSIC BOX TOYS; MUSICAL TOYS; NON-RIDING TRANSPORTATION TOYS; PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL TOYS; PLASTIC CHARACTER TOYS; PLAY MATS CONTAINING INFANT TOYS; PLUSH TOYS; POP UP TOYS; PRINTING TOYS; PULL TOYS; PUNCHING TOYS; PUSH TOYS; RIDE-ON TOYS; RUBBER CHARACTER TOYS; SAND TOYS; SANDBOX TOYS; SKETCHING TOYS; SOFT SCULPTURE TOYS; SQUEEZE TOYS; TALKING TOYS; TOSSING DISC TOYS; TOY WATER BOTTLES; WATER SQUIRTING TOYS; WIND-UP TOYS; yo-yos; paper dolls; children's TOY magnet sets | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |