Drawing for HOGWASH

USPTO serial 78109511

HOGWASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOGWASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Day

CHRISTOPHER J DAY LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER DAY340 E PALM LNSTE 282PHOENIX, AZ 85004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Motorcycle cleaning solution, but not including compositions for cleaning and degreasing automotive partsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance