Drawing for PLATINUM RADIANCE

USPTO serial 78109534

PLATINUM RADIANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLATINUM RADIANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M JOHN CARSON

M JOHN CARSON FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP865 S FIGUEROATWENTY-NINTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90017-2571

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003full line of non-medicated skin and body care preparations and cosmeticsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2004ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance