USPTO serial 78109635
PHOTO THEATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3098725Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 30, 2006
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PHOTO THEATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Marcos, TX
San Marcos, TX
San Marcos, TX
CONCORD, NC
DNP PHOTO IMAGING AMERICA CORPORATION
SAN MARCOS, TX
Other trademarks owned by DNP PHOTO IMAGING AMERICA CORPORATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J Booth
Matthew J Booth Matthew J Booth & Associates PLLC900 Second Avenue South, Suite 1560c/o CPA GlobalMinneapolis, MN 55402-5050Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic equipment and media namely scanners; color printers; disc writers namely, CD disc writers, DVD disc writers, VCD disc writers; image enhancement electronic and computer hardware; image enhancement software; optical discs containing audio, video, digital images, photographic images, and multimedia content; optical disc players; and remote controls for use in recording, storage, transmission and retrieval of digital images, and photographic images | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 22, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pixel Magic Imaging, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pixel Magic Imaging, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pixel Magic Imaging, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DNP IMS AMERICA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DNP PHOTO IMAGING AMERICA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PHOTO THEATER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 2, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 22, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |