USPTO serial 78109999
GRANDPA'S GOURMET GARAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRANDPA'S GOURMET GARAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER S SLOANE
PETER S SLOANE OSTROLENK FABER GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, television show and video production services; ongoing children's television show | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |