Drawing for WM STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES

USPTO serial 78110065

WM STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WM STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynne E. Graybeal

LYNNE E GRAYBEAL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Banking services; credit and debit card services; checking and savings account services; financial and investment services, namely, investment brokerage services, securities brokerage services and financial portfolio management services; providing banking, financial, investment, securities, credit card, and lending information via the Internet; online trading of stocks, bonds and other securities for others; financial services, namely, providing an online web site featuring information on the subject of financial research, financial investment, financial portfolio management, financial portfolio performance analysis and calculation of financial risk, and enabling users to track their individual securities trading transactions via the internet; financial forecasting, namely, financial portfolio performance simulation and cash flow forecasting; all of the aforementioned services provided to the investing public, consisting of individual retail and individual and corporate commercial customers, but not investment professionals; and philanthropic services consisting of monetary donationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 7, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 20, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 21, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 27, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 19, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance