Drawing for LIVE BY A NEW SET OF RULES

USPTO serial 78110081

LIVE BY A NEW SET OF RULES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVE BY A NEW SET OF RULES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony L. Ludlow

ANTHONY L LUDLOW HALLETT & PERRIN, PC2001 BRYAN STSTE 3900DALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, banking; bill payment and presentment services; credit card services; debit card services; charge card services; prepaid purchase card services offered through cards with stored value, namely, processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; electronic cash, credit card and debit transactions, and transaction authorization services; cash disbursement services; cash replacement rendered by credit cards; automated teller machine services; payment processing services; credit card and debit card verification services; payment authentication services; facilitating person-to-person payment services through electronic means; electronic funds transfer; currency exchange services over global communications networks; providing credit and debit card data and reports; financial assessment and risk management services for others in the field of consumer credit; credit management services; providing financial information via a global computer network; financial consultation and advisory servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance