USPTO serial 78110167
IT'S NOT JUST HOME IMPROVEMENT, IT'S LIFE IMPROVEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IT'S NOT JUST HOME IMPROVEMENT, IT'S LIFE IMPROVEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FELICIA J. BOYD
FELICIA J BOYD FAEGRE & BENSON LLP2200 WLS FARGO CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal windows and doors | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non-metal windows and doors | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of windows and doors | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | For construction and installation of doors, windows and screens, and fabrication of accessories for retrofitting doors and windows | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Custom design services for retrofitting doors and windows and accessories therefore | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pella Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Pella Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IT'S NOT JUST HOME IMPROVEMENT, IT'S LIFE IMPROVEMENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |