USPTO serial 78110842
VICTORIOUS AMERICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VICTORIOUS AMERICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Coins, Lapel pins, Broaches, Necklaces and Bracelets branded with the mark | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Playing cards, tote bags, boxes, stationary, greeting cards, postcards branded with the mark | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Leather goods, such as jackets, skirts, pants, satchels, tote bags, bracelets, backpacks, branded with the mark | ACTIVE | Feb 12, 2002 |
| 021 | Large and small Mugs, plates, thermos, branded with the mark | ACTIVE | Feb 12, 2002 |
| 025 | Clothing, such as T-shirts, long sleeve T-shirts, baby tees, sport shirts, polo shirts, baseball caps, bucket hats, boxer shorts, denim shirts, pants and ties branded with the mark | ACTIVE | Feb 12, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oren Nikkaran Barforough
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named VICTORIOUS AMERICA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PRRG | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2005 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |