Drawing for IDENTAGUARD

USPTO serial 78110973

IDENTAGUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY, SUSAN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IDENTAGUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN C. LIESKE

STEVEN C LIESKE E 3400OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLP45 S SEVENTH ST PLZ VII STEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036INSURANCE SERVICES, NAMELY, INSURING THEFT OF ONE'S PERSONAL IDENTITYABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 20, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 20, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 19, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 10, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance