USPTO serial 78111465
NYC 2012
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NYC 2012?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony S. Cannatella
ANTHONY S CANNATELLA PAVIA & HARCOURT LLP600 MADISON AVE 12 FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | BELTS; NECKTIES; SUSPENDERS; BANDANNAS; BEACH SANDALS; INFANT AND TODDLER SLEEPWEAR, BATHROBES; NIGHTSHIRTS, PAJAMAS AND LOUNGEWEAR; BEACH COVER-UP DRESSES; CLOTH TODDLER SHORT AND TOP SETS; GIRLS KNIT DRESSES WITH PLAYPANTS; SOCKS; PLAYSETS; BOYS SHORTS AND TOP SETS; SOCKS; PLAY SUITS; COVERALLS; COLLARLESS SHIRTS; SHORTS; PANTS AND SLACKS; SHIRTS; JACKETS; JUDGES, TEAM, REFEREE AND UMPIRE UNIFORMS; JERSEYS; MATERNITY TOPS; BOWTIES; HEADWEAR AND SCARVES; HEADBANDS; RAINWEAR, NAMELY, RAIN PONCHOS AND JACKETS; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY SHOES, BOOTS AND SHIRTS; SLIPPERS; THONGS; NYLON SHELLS; HATS; CAPS; PULLOVERS; GOLF SHIRTS AND HATS; BLAZERS; JEANS; LEOTARDS; WORKOUT AND SPORTS APPAREL, NAMELY, SHORTS, JACKETS; MEN'S, WOMENS AND CHILDREN'S SWIMWEAR. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |