Drawing for THE POWER OF ONE

USPTO serial 78111701

THE POWER OF ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE POWER OF ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce W. McKee

FELICIA J BOYD FAEGRE & BENSON LLP2200 WLS FARGO CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Accessories for retrofitting doors and windows, namely, metal window screens, metal sash fasteners for windows, and metal handles for windows and doorsACTIVE—
019Accessories for retrofitting doors and windows, namely, non-metal window screens, non-metal sash fasteners for windows, and non-metal handles for windows and doorsACTIVE—
035Retail store services in the field of windows and doorsACTIVE—
037Installation of doors, windows and screensACTIVE—
040Custom construction of doors, windows and screens; custom fabrication of accessories for retrofitting doors and windowsACTIVE—
042Custom design services in the field of retrofitting doors and windowsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 29, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 21, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance