USPTO serial 78111967
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan B. Flohr
SUSAN B FLOHR BLANK ROME LLP600 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Arranging for discounts on nursing and consumer-related services and products, namely, product discounts, magazine discounts, airfare and lodging discounts, long-distance telephone discounts, and prescription card discounts; providing an online computer database of employment opportunities in the field of nursing; providing online job postings to members in the field of nursing. TMEP §1402.11 | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |