Drawing for NURSESUSA

USPTO serial 78111970

NURSESUSA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NURSESUSA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan B. Flohr

SUSAN B FLOHR BLANK ROME LLP600 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042association services, namely, promoting the interests of nurses and nursingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 22, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 22, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 14, 2004GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 12, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 4, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance