USPTO serial 78112293
WHO DAT? BLUES BAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2890070Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2004
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WHO DAT? BLUES BAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Greg Latham
Greg Latham Intellectual Property Consulting, LLC201 St. Charles Ave. #2500New Orleans, LA 70170UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment, namely, live performances by a musical band | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PARKER, RONNIE LEE
- Other trademarks owned by PARKER, RONNIE LEE
- Other trademarks owned by PARKER, RONNIE LEE
- Other trademarks owned by WHO DAT?, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WHO DAT? BLUES BAND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 9, 2012 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 14, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 7, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |