USPTO serial 78112356
MEDIASONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3677819Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 2009
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MEDIASONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dartford, Kent, GB
Dartford, Kent, GB
Dartford, Kent, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank L. Politano
Frank L. Politano K&L GATESOne Newark Center, 10th FloorNewark, NJ 07102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | High definition video servers; microprocessors for use in video and audio-video equipment and in display devices; computer software for control and monitoring of displays and exhibits; digital video and audio encoders and decoders; digital video and audio players and recorders; digital transmitters; [ audio transmitters; ] apparatus for distributing digital video and audio over networks; namely, network peripheral devices consisting of TCP/IP controlled interface units for controlling non TCP/IP-capable equipment without inbuilt network connectivity such as DVD players, special effects units such as smoke machines, lighting controllers, digital sound stores, plasma displays, and projectors; [ processors for controlling multi-screen video displays; ] video equipment controllers; controllers and monitors for audio visual equipment; [ image processors; video displays; networked video displays; video projectors; ] HD players; HD decoder cards; [ DVD players; ] capture station/player units that accept a DVB/ASI (digital video broadcast/asynchronous serial interface) input stream from a broadcast high definition MPEG2 encoder and record the stream to a local hard drive for later use as the playback content on high definition MPEG2 playback equipment; and parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |