USPTO serial 78112427
BABYDERM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABYDERM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical product (anti-microbial/anti-bacterial lotion) adapted for baby use; disinfectant destroys bacterial infections. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |