USPTO serial 78112442
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anand Gupta
ANAND GUPTA MUNSCH HARDT KOPF & HARR, PC4000 FOUNTAIN PL1445 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75202-2790| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | CAFE AND RESTAURANT SERVICES FOR PROVIDING FOOD AND DRINKS, NAMELY BREADS, SWEET BREADS, PASTIES, CAKES, NAPOLEONS, ECLAIRS, PALMIERS, SANDWICHES, BAGLES, AREPAS, CACHAPAS, HALLACAS, TAMALES, CREPES, FONDUE, CHURROS, EMPANADAS, TURN OVERS, CROISSANTS, DANISH, MUFFINS, CINNAMON ROLLS, COOKIES, TEQUENOS, CHEESE STICKS, PIZZA, PASTA, SALADS, COFFEE, CHOCOLATES, OMELETS, NATURAL JUICES, TEA, SODAS, LATIN AMERICAN SODAS, BEER AND WINE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |