Drawing for INDUSTRIAS IC COQUET-ARKETA

USPTO serial 78112456

INDUSTRIAS IC COQUET-ARKETA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3008465Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 25, 2005
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INDUSTRIAS IC COQUET-ARKETA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brittany J. Maxey

Brittany J. Maxey MAXEY LAW OFFICES, PLLC15500 ROOSEVELT BLVD., SUITE 305CLEARWATER, FL 33760UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Canned vegetablesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
May 4, 2012NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED—
May 4, 20128.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 12, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 4, 2012ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 12, 2005DP1B1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION—
Dec 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2004IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Nov 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 29, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 18, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance