USPTO serial 78112571
HERBAWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HERBAWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
A 1230 Vienna, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GORDON TROY
GORDON TROY GORDON E. R. TROY, PC3333 LK RDPO BOX 368CHARLOTTE, VT 05445Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUME COSMETICS PREPARATIONS FOR THE BODY AND BEAUTY CARE, NAMELY HAIR-CARE-PREPARATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF AGING-DISEASES. DIETARY FOOD SUPPLEMENTS SUPPLEMENT PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF TABLETS, POWERS. CAPSULES AND LIQUIDS, NAMELY HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS AND FOOD SUPPLEMENTS DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS BABY FOOD HERBAL TEAS FOR MEDICINAL PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | HERBAL DRINKS AND JUICES, NAMELY HERBAL TEAS HERBAL FOOD BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |