Drawing for DELIVERING THE PROMISE OF TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 78112733

DELIVERING THE PROMISE OF TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELIVERING THE PROMISE OF TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services and consulting for the design and implementation of solutions including servers, networking, applications and outsourcing.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 21, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance