Drawing for AT THE CORE OF CLINICAL WORKFLOW

USPTO serial 78112771

AT THE CORE OF CLINICAL WORKFLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AT THE CORE OF CLINICAL WORKFLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CATHERINE MENNENGA

CATHERINE MENNENGA GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY3135 EASTON TPKEFAIRFIELD, CT 06431UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER MEDICAL SOFTWARE FOR USE IN INPATIENT AND OUTPATIENT CLINICAL CARE AREAS, RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENTS, AND CARDIOLOGY DEPARTMENTS TO PROVIDE ELECTRONIC PATIENT RECORD, INCLUDING INFORMATION AND IMAGE MANAGEMENTACTIVE—
037COMPUTER HARDWARE SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER HARDWAREACTIVE—
042INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES IN THE MEDICAL AND HEALTHCARE RELATED FIELD, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS IN PERSON, VIA TELEPHONE AND EMAIL; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY MONITORING OF NETWORK SYSTEMS FOR ALL THE FOREGOING SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2004PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN—
Jul 9, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 6, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 15, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 27, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance