Drawing for JEAN THERAPY

USPTO serial 78112831

JEAN THERAPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JEAN THERAPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RANDEE SIBUL-GELBERT

RANDEE SIBUL-GELBERT MEITUS GELBERT LLP10 W MARKET ST STE 1720INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing namely dresses, shorts, pants, skirts, jeans, jumpers, jackets, shirts, skooter skirts, capris, rompers, short sets, shortalls, pants sets, capri setsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 31, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 30, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance