USPTO serial 78113094
BELISSIMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 2, 2004
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BELISSIMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex D. Patel
JOHN ALUMIT PATEL & ALUMIT PC16830 VENTURA BLVD STE 360ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | HOME TEXTILE PRODUCTS, NAMELY COMFORTERS, PILLOW SHAMS, BED SKIRTS, DUST RUFFLES, PILLOW CASES, PILLOW COVERS, DUVET COVERS, BED SPREADS, BED SHEETS, BLANKETS, DUVETS, FABRIC TABLE TOPPERS, TABLE CLOTHS, FABRIC TABLE RUNNERS, TEXTILE NAPKINS, TOWELS; WINDOW TREATMENTS; NAMELY, DRAPES, CURTAINS, SWAGS AND VALANCES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 19, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |