USPTO serial 78113334
XDTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XDTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Anthony Rolfe
J ANTHONY ROLFE WENTHUR & CHACHAS4180 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DRSTE 500LA JOLLA, CA 92037Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BURGLAR ALARMS; CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION CAMERAS, VIDEO AND SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS; VIDEO MONITORS; VIDEO SYSTEMS, NAMELY DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS, DIGITAL STORAGE SYSTEMS FOR DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS, AND TIME-LAPSE DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS FOR USE WITH CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION OR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, INCLUDING VIDEO CAMERAS, TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, MULTIPLEXERS, QUADS, VIDEO CAMERA CONTROLLERS, MATRIX SWITCHERS; FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER CONTROL OVER CLOSED CIRCUIT CAMERAS AND VIDEO CAMERAS, ACCESS AND SECURITY SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | Jun 17, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |