USPTO serial 78113394
ECOFRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2903098Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 16, 2004
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECOFRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Delhi, IN
Delhi, IN
Delhi, IN
ARCTIC INDIA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD
DELHI, IN
DESICCANT ROTORS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED
DELHI- 100 054, IN
Other trademarks owned by DESICCANT ROTORS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED
DESICCANT ROTORS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED
DELHI- 100 054, IN
Other trademarks owned by DESICCANT ROTORS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ilene B. Tannen
Ilene B. Tannen JONES DAY222 East 41st StreetNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Energy recovery ventilators; fresh air preconditioners and energy saving preconditioners which recover energy exhausted out from conditioned air spaces and uses the recovered energy to precondition, i;e; heat or cool, fresh air being brought into conditioned spaces such as classrooms, homes, offices, conference rooms, restaurants, pubs, etc; treated fresh air units, also known as fresh air units, which are [ packages ] * packaged * air handling units incorporating energy recovery to ensure fresh air is preconditioned prior to entering conditioned spaces and preconditions the fresh air with the energy recovered from air conditioning systems; air handling units for treating fresh air, heat recovery wheels; energy recovery rotors, also known as heat wheels, for recovering wasted energy from the air exhausted from the conditioned spaces and used to precondition the fresh air being brought into the conditioned spaces to improve/maintain/enhance quality of air in conditioned spaces such as hotels, hospitals, commercial buildings, auditoriums and all other types of conditioned spaces; and structural parts and fittings for the aforementioned goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pahw, Deepak
- Other trademarks owned by Pahw, Deepak
- Other trademarks owned by Pahw, Deepak
- Other trademarks owned by ARCTIC INDIA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD
- Other trademarks owned by DESICCANT ROTORS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by DESICCANT ROTORS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named ECOFRESH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |