Drawing for CSO VISION

USPTO serial 78114168

CSO VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CSO VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK B. HARRISON

MIRIAM KARLIN INTERNATIONAL DATA GROUP INC5 SPEEN STFRAMINGHAM, MA 01701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed publications, namely, newsletters, magazines and supplements sold therewith, featuring information in the fields of computers, computer software, online services, high technology, communications, information technology and information servicesACTIVE—
041Providing an online magazine, featuring information in the fields of computers, computer software, online services, high technology, communications, information technology and information services; organizing and conducting educational conferences, seminars and expositions in the fields of computers, computer software, online services, high technology, communications, information technology and information servicesACTIVE—
045Providing a website on global computer networks featuring information in the field of security to security officers, security executives and other executives who are responsible for directing security strategy and purchasing at their companiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 11, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 7, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 10, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 25, 2003GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 27, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 27, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 11, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 24, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance