USPTO serial 78114391
FASTRAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FASTRAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Trabuco Canyon, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Connors
JOHN J CONNORS1600 DOVE ST #220NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | tracking services for retrieval of encoded products, excluding railcars in transit | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |