USPTO serial 78114395
MISSION 7
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MISSION 7?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Hughes
MICHAEL J HUGHES IPLO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW OFFICES1901 S BASCOM AVE STE 660CAMPBELL, CA 95008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE, NAMELY, OPTICAL ENTRANCE ENCLOSURES; OPTICAL COUPLERS; OPTICAL FIBER FRAMES, SHELVES, TRAYS, AND CABINETS; CUSTOMIZED OPTICAL JUMPERS AND PIGTAILS; FIBER OPTIC SPLICE CLOSURES; FIBER RECEIVER SERVICE CABLES; FIBER LOOPS; INTEGRATED OPTICAL CIRCUITS; TRANSCEIVERS; OPTICAL SWITCHES; OPTICAL WAVEGUIDES; PRESSURE SENSORS; INTERFEROMETERS; OPTICAL GYROS; OPTICAL DELAY LINES; OPTICAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS; DISTANCE MEASURERS; TEMPERATURE SENSORS; CHEMICAL SENSORS; BIOLOGICAL SENSORS; FIBER OPTIC COUPLERS; MULTI/DEMULTIPLEXERS; WAVELENGTH FILTERS; OPTICAL MODULATORS; FIBER OPTIC TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS; FIBER OPTIC CABLES; FIBER OPTIC CABLE ASSEMBLIES; FIBER OPTIC INDICATORS; AND FLEXIBLE FIBER OPTIC LIGHT GUIDES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |