USPTO serial 78114862
BLADERACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2872960Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2004
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLADERACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN DIEGO, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Austin, TX
Poway, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth K. Rucki
Elizabeth K. Rucki Baker Botts L.L.P.2001 Ross AvenueSuite 900Dallas, TX 75201-2900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Rack mounted computers, namely, computer hardware and software for integrating and operating the same | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VS ACQUISITION CO, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RackSaver, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by RackSaver, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BOXX TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CIRRASCALE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BLADERACK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 21, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |